Azure Queue Storage vs. RabbitMQ
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Azure Queue Storage | RabbitMQ |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 3.9 | 4.1 |
| Review count | 13 | 46 |
| Ease of use | 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Ease of setup | 9.0 | 8.6 |
| Quality of support | 8.7 | 8.5 |
| Meets requirements | 8.7 | 8.9 |
| NPS | 25 | 35.555556 |
| Small Business | 38.5% | 37.0% |
| Mid-Market | 30.8% | 39.1% |
| Enterprise | 30.8% | 23.9% |
| Total page views | 81 | 508 |
| Total LLM citations | 17 | 2,186 |
Azure Queue Storage
Azure Queue storage provides cloud messaging between application components. Queue storage gives you asynchronous message queueing for communication between application components, whether they are running in the cloud, on the desktop, on-premises, or on mobile devices.
RabbitMQ
RabbitMQ is the most popular open source message broker, with more than 35,000 production deployments world-wide. RabbitMQ is lightweight and easy to deploy on premises and in the cloud and runs on all major operating systems. It supports most developer platforms, multiple messaging protocols and can be deployed in distributed and federated configurations to meet high-scale, high-availability requirements.