Azure Files vs. Google Cloud NetApp Volumes
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Azure Files | Google Cloud NetApp Volumes |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.0 | 4.2 |
| Review count | 55 | 10 |
| Ease of use | 8.4 | 9.4 |
| Ease of setup | 8.6 | 10.0 |
| Quality of support | 8.1 | 9.0 |
| Meets requirements | 8.8 | 8.6 |
| NPS | 25.490196 | 50 |
| Small Business | 20.8% | 20.0% |
| Mid-Market | 34.0% | 20.0% |
| Enterprise | 45.3% | 60.0% |
| Total page views | 147 | 80 |
| Total LLM citations | 294 | 88 |
Azure Files
Azure File offers fully managed file shares in the cloud, accessible via the industry standard Server Message Block (SMB) protocol. Azure File shares is mounted concurrently by cloud or on-premises deployments of Windows, macOS, and Linux.
- Customer Support
- Azure Services
- Implementation Ease
- Security Protection
- Ease of Use
- Learning
Google Cloud NetApp Volumes
NetApp® Cloud Volumes for Google Cloud is a fully managed or self-managed file service that is integrated into Google Cloud with the multiprotocol support, performance, and availability required to run business-critical applications. It is designed to provide massively parallel shared access to thousands of Google Compute Engine and Google Kubernetes Engine instances, enabling your applications to achieve high levels of aggregate throughput and IOPS with consistent low latencies. Use cases. Customers can use the service to migrate existing enterprise applications to Google Cloud.
- Integrations
- Features
- Cloud Services
- Storage Solutions
- Backup
- Cost-Effective