AWS Elastic Load Balancing vs. F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | AWS Elastic Load Balancing | F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Review count | 96 | 40 |
| Ease of use | 8.7 | 9.1 |
| Ease of setup | 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Quality of support | 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Meets requirements | 9.2 | 9.3 |
| NPS | 73.626374 | 73.529412 |
| Small Business | 25.3% | 8.1% |
| Mid-Market | 46.3% | 21.6% |
| Enterprise | 28.4% | 70.3% |
| Total page views | 176 | 186 |
| Total LLM citations | 509 | 1,146 |
AWS Elastic Load Balancing
Elastic Load Balancing automatically distributes incoming application traffic across multiple targets, such as Amazon EC2 instances, containers, and IP addresses. It can handle the varying load of your application traffic in a single Availability Zone or across multiple Availability Zones. Elastic Load Balancing offers three types of load balancers that all feature the high availability, automatic scaling, and robust security necessary to make your applications fault tolerant.
- Security
- Ease of Use
- Scalability
- Features
- Cloud Storage
- Cost Efficiency
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
F5 BIG-IP LTM optimizes the speed and reliability of your applications via both network and application layers. Using real-time protocol and traffic management decisions based on application and server conditions, extensive connection management, and TCP and content offloading, BIG-IP LTM dramatically improves application and infrastructure responsiveness. LTM's full proxy architecture give users protocol awareness to control traffic for the most important applications.
- Features
- Configuration Ease
- Security
- Reliability
- Load Balancing
- Simple