AWS Cost and Usage Report vs. Costory
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | AWS Cost and Usage Report | Costory |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 3.7 | 4.8 |
| Review count | 15 | 16 |
| Ease of use | 8.4 | 9.2 |
| Ease of setup | 7.1 | 9.2 |
| Quality of support | 8.9 | 10.0 |
| Meets requirements | 9.3 | 9.0 |
| NPS | 0 | 100 |
| Small Business | 53.3% | 18.8% |
| Mid-Market | 40.0% | 68.8% |
| Enterprise | 6.7% | 12.5% |
| Total page views | 81 | 126 |
| Total LLM citations | 28 | 96 |
AWS Cost and Usage Report
The AWS Cost & Usage Report lists AWS usage for each service category used by an account and its IAM users in hourly or daily line items, as well as any tags that you have activated for cost allocation purposes. You can also customize the AWS Cost & Usage Report to aggregate your usage data to the daily or monthly level.
- Cost Saving
Costory
Dashboards got cheap. Context didn't. Ask Claude "why did our AWS bill go up last week?" without Costory and you get 15 plausible answers. Ask it through Costory's MCP endpoint and you get one: the deploy, the team, the service, the baseline. That is the difference between a pipe to billing data and a context layer. Costory is the operator layer that normalizes spend across AWS, GCP, Azure, Datadog, OpenAI, and Anthropic, allocates it to teams, correlates it with deploys and incidents, and exposes it to your AI assistants and the tools your team already uses.
- Ease of Use
- Collaboration
- Response Time
- Customer Support
- Data Centralization
- Insights