AwardSpring Scholarship Management vs. Good Grants
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | AwardSpring Scholarship Management | Good Grants |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.7 | 4.5 |
| Review count | 115 | 90 |
| Ease of use | 9.1 | 8.4 |
| Ease of setup | 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Quality of support | 9.8 | 9.4 |
| Meets requirements | 9.2 | 8.9 |
| NPS | 80.869565 | 66.666667 |
| Small Business | 64.3% | 71.6% |
| Mid-Market | 27.0% | 23.5% |
| Enterprise | 8.7% | 4.9% |
| Total page views | 629 | 932 |
| Total LLM citations | 126 | 2,495 |
AwardSpring Scholarship Management
AwardSpring Scholarship Management runs the whole scholarship season in one system: applications, review, awarding, and reporting. Students complete one application and are matched to every scholarship they qualify for, so committees start scoring on day one. Awards post cleanly, and reporting runs from fund-level detail to a program-wide view. Support answers in 16 minutes on average, and teams rate AwardSpring 4.7 out of 5 on G2 across 110 reviews.
Good Grants
Good Grants is an internationalised grantmaking platform that helps small to medium sized grantmakers around the world affordably accept, manage and fund good grant applications, their way. Designed for grantmakers who have outgrown manual processes and spreadsheet program management, Good Grants offers an attractive alternative to overpriced grantmaking software. How does it help? Good Grants empowers grantmakers to manage the entire grant lifecycle, streamline processes and optimise funding, from wherever they are, online.