G2 Vendor Directory

AuthN by IDEE vs. Portnox

A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.

MetricAuthN by IDEE

by IDEE GmbH

Portnox

by Portnox

Overall rating4.84.4
Review count55123
Ease of use9.58.8
Ease of setup9.08.4
Quality of support9.78.9
Meets requirements9.69.2
NPS92.15686361.788618
Small Business45.3%16.7%
Mid-Market34.0%43.0%
Enterprise20.8%40.4%
Total page views207967
Total LLM citations2593,298

AuthN by IDEE

Traditional MFA (OTP, PUSH) is a nightmare to deploy enterprise-wide, despised by users for requiring a second device (phone or token), and powerless against credential phishing & MFA bypass attacks – the #1 global attack vectors. This is why IDEE built AuthN. Next generation MFA. We call it MFA 2.0. Our next-generation Zero-trust architecture is fully decentralised, which means we have no central credentials database - the single point of failure that hackers seek to exploit. This architecture is based on public-key cryptography. The same tech underlying crypto-currencies.

Pros

  • Ease of Use
  • Security
  • Easy Integrations
  • Customer Support
  • Autofill Feature
  • Biometric Authentication

Portnox

Portnox delivers continuous, zero-trust access control for every identity, human and non-human, securing local network and remote access from a single, cloud-native platform. It continuously verifies access based on identity context, device posture, and risk signals, unifying passwordless authentication, policy enforcement, and automated response through one policy engine.

Pros

  • Ease of Use
  • Setup Ease
  • Implementation Ease
  • Customer Support
  • Security
  • Cloud Services