Applied vs. Archer from hackajob
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Applied | Archer from hackajob |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.5 | 4.8 |
| Review count | 21 | 136 |
| Ease of use | 8.7 | 9.4 |
| Ease of setup | 8.7 | 9.3 |
| Quality of support | 9.1 | 9.8 |
| Meets requirements | 8.6 | 9.2 |
| NPS | 66.666667 | 86.466165 |
| Small Business | 57.1% | 4.5% |
| Mid-Market | 38.1% | 35.8% |
| Enterprise | 4.8% | 59.7% |
| Total page views | 48 | 619 |
| Total LLM citations | 59 | 40 |
Applied
Applied is the essential platform for unbiased hiring. We often make decisions without realising that our unconscious biases play a role. This can even happen when we have good intentions, so naturally, it will creep into our hiring decisions. Applied offers a solution to reduce this bias when hiring to improve traditional methods. We're trying to create a fairer world, one hire at a time! Our platform has been designed to help our customers find the best talent for their open positions.
Archer from hackajob
Archer is the AI sourcing agent for passive, in-demand talent, the people your team wants to interview but can't reach through job ads alone. Hiring is stuck: you drown in applications that don't fit, the people you actually want never apply, and it takes too many interviews to make a single hire. Archer fixes the top of your funnel. Tell it what a great hire looks like, and it works across every open role: finding, engaging and qualifying the right people, including the ones who aren't looking, and delivering them into the ATS you already use as qualified, ID-verified candidates.
- Candidate Quality
- Ease of Use
- Time Efficiency
- Talent Acquisition
- Candidate Qualification
- Successful Hiring