Anthology Portfolio vs. McGraw-Hill Connect
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Anthology Portfolio | McGraw-Hill Connect |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.1 | 3.6 |
| Review count | 14 | 176 |
| Ease of use | 7.4 | 7.7 |
| Ease of setup | 7.7 | 7.8 |
| Quality of support | 9.2 | 7.7 |
| Meets requirements | 8.6 | 8.2 |
| NPS | 42.857143 | 16.766467 |
| Small Business | 21.4% | 22.7% |
| Mid-Market | 57.1% | 36.4% |
| Enterprise | 21.4% | 40.9% |
| Total page views | 237 | 469 |
| Total LLM citations | 2,678 | 2,047 |
Anthology Portfolio
Anthology Portfolio is designed to capture, assess, and showcase student growth over their entire learning journey, both inside and outside of the classroom. In addition to giving students a professional portfolio to share upon graduation, the learning artifacts and supporting assessment data collected in Portfolio can be used by institutions to surface powerful insights on learning outcomes - enabling them to make data-informed decisions on how to improve their courses and programs.
McGraw-Hill Connect
McGraw-Hill Education Connect is a robust toolkit of learning resources designed with the flexibility instructors need, to unlock the potential of a diverse student population. Connect provides opportunities for both formative and summative assessment. Our adaptive technology provides students with a safe place to make mistakes encouraging deliberate practice and enabling them to move one step closer to mastery. AUTO-GRADING Your valuable time and expertise should be devoted to teaching—not grading.