Amp vs. Cursor
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Amp | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Review count | 92 | 329 |
| Ease of use | 8.8 | 9.3 |
| Ease of setup | 9.0 | 9.3 |
| Quality of support | 8.5 | 8.6 |
| Meets requirements | 8.6 | 9.2 |
| NPS | 65.934066 | 79.076923 |
| Small Business | 68.5% | 71.3% |
| Mid-Market | 20.7% | 21.3% |
| Enterprise | 10.9% | 7.5% |
| Total page views | 506 | 3,632 |
| Total LLM citations | 9,246 | 30,409 |
Amp
Sourcegraph’s AI code assistant goes beyond individual dev productivity, helping enterprises achieve consistency and quality at scale with AI. Sourcegraph accelerates the entire workflow for developers by providing them a more natural and intuitive way to work. Searching code, chatting with AI, invoking prompts, and using agents can now all be performed in one place with the best models available.
- Ease of Use
- Coding Assistance
- User Experience
- Easy Integrations
- Features
- Time-saving
Cursor
Cursor is an agentic coding platform for enterprises building ambitious software. With access to frontier models, developers can focus on higher-level direction, while agents drive implementation and code review. Used by 64% of Fortune 500 companies, Cursor accelerates software development without compromising quality, control, or security. Key Features and Functionality: - Agentic development workflows: Cursor helps developers delegate coding tasks to agents while staying in control of direction, review, and iteration.
- Ease of Use
- Coding Assistance
- Features
- Performance Speed
- Problem Solving
- Time-saving