G2 Vendor Directory

Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) vs. Amazon MemoryDB

A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.

MetricAmazon Relational Database Service (RDS)

by Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Amazon MemoryDB

by Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Overall rating4.54.4
Review count90722
Ease of use9.09.3
Ease of setup9.09.4
Quality of support8.88.8
Meets requirements9.19.3
NPS66.16454254.545455
Small Business28.8%31.8%
Mid-Market37.5%27.3%
Enterprise33.7%40.9%
Total page views64653
Total LLM citations2,38932

Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)

Amazon Relational Database Service (Amazon RDS) makes it easy to set up, operate, and scale a relational database in the cloud. It provides cost-efficient and resizable capacity while managing time-consuming database administration tasks such as hardware provisioning, database setup, patching and backups. It frees you up to focus on your apps so you can give them the better performance, availability, security, and compatibility they need. Amazon RDS is available on 6 familiar database instances: Amazon Aurora, MySQL, PostgreSQL, MariaDB, Oracle Database and SQL Server engines.

Pros

  • Ease of Use
  • Scalability
  • Setup Ease
  • Security
  • Backup Services
  • Reliability

Amazon MemoryDB

Amazon MemoryDB for Redis is a Redis-compatible, durable, in-memory database that delivers ultra-fast performance and Multi-AZ durability. With Amazon MemoryDB for Redis, you only pay for what you use with no minimum fee. A node is the smallest building block of a MemoryDB cluster. Each node supports varying amounts of computation and memory capacity, and you can select a node type based on your needs. You are charged based on three components: on-demand instance hours per node, volume of data written to your cluster, and snapshot storage that you use.

Pros