G2 Vendor Directory

Amazon MemoryDB vs. Supabase

A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.

MetricAmazon MemoryDB

by Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Supabase

by Supabase

Overall rating4.44.6
Review count22241
Ease of use9.39.2
Ease of setup9.49.2
Quality of support8.88.7
Meets requirements9.39.3
NPS54.54545579.831933
Small Business31.8%77.2%
Mid-Market27.3%20.3%
Enterprise40.9%2.5%
Total page views532,127
Total LLM citations3223,761

Amazon MemoryDB

Amazon MemoryDB for Redis is a Redis-compatible, durable, in-memory database that delivers ultra-fast performance and Multi-AZ durability. With Amazon MemoryDB for Redis, you only pay for what you use with no minimum fee. A node is the smallest building block of a MemoryDB cluster. Each node supports varying amounts of computation and memory capacity, and you can select a node type based on your needs. You are charged based on three components: on-demand instance hours per node, volume of data written to your cluster, and snapshot storage that you use.

Pros

    Supabase

    Supabase is an open-source backend-as-a-service (BaaS) platform that enables developers to build and scale applications efficiently without managing server infrastructure. Launched in 2020 as an alternative to Firebase, Supabase offers a suite of tools including a PostgreSQL database, authentication, real-time subscriptions, and storage capabilities. By leveraging the robustness of PostgreSQL, Supabase provides a scalable and secure foundation for modern web and mobile applications.

    Pros

    • Ease of Use
    • Features
    • User-Friendly
    • Easy Integrations
    • Setup Ease
    • Integrations