Amazon MemoryDB vs. IBM Cloudant
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Amazon MemoryDB | IBM Cloudant |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.4 | 3.8 |
| Review count | 22 | 42 |
| Ease of use | 9.3 | 8.8 |
| Ease of setup | 9.4 | 9.3 |
| Quality of support | 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Meets requirements | 9.3 | 8.8 |
| NPS | 54.545455 | 2.564103 |
| Small Business | 31.8% | 45.2% |
| Mid-Market | 27.3% | 23.8% |
| Enterprise | 40.9% | 31.0% |
| Total page views | 53 | 96 |
| Total LLM citations | 32 | 106 |
Amazon MemoryDB
Amazon MemoryDB for Redis is a Redis-compatible, durable, in-memory database that delivers ultra-fast performance and Multi-AZ durability. With Amazon MemoryDB for Redis, you only pay for what you use with no minimum fee. A node is the smallest building block of a MemoryDB cluster. Each node supports varying amounts of computation and memory capacity, and you can select a node type based on your needs. You are charged based on three components: on-demand instance hours per node, volume of data written to your cluster, and snapshot storage that you use.
IBM Cloudant
Fully Managed — IBM Cloud service provides a fully managed, distributed JSON document database. Instantly deploy an instance, create databases, and independently scale throughput capacity and data storage to meet your application requirements. IBM expertise takes away the pain of hardware and software provisioning, patching and upgrades, while offering a 99.95 percent SLA. Secure — Cloudant is ISO27001, SOC 2 Type 2 compliant and HIPAA ready. All data is encrypted over the wire and at rest with optional user-defined key management through IBM Key Protect.