G2 Vendor Directory

Amazon MemoryDB vs. Amazon Aurora

A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.

MetricAmazon MemoryDB

by Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Amazon Aurora

by Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Overall rating4.44.5
Review count22456
Ease of use9.38.9
Ease of setup9.48.8
Quality of support8.88.9
Meets requirements9.39.1
NPS54.54545565.517241
Small Business31.8%37.7%
Mid-Market27.3%33.8%
Enterprise40.9%28.5%
Total page views53391
Total LLM citations321,532

Amazon MemoryDB

Amazon MemoryDB for Redis is a Redis-compatible, durable, in-memory database that delivers ultra-fast performance and Multi-AZ durability. With Amazon MemoryDB for Redis, you only pay for what you use with no minimum fee. A node is the smallest building block of a MemoryDB cluster. Each node supports varying amounts of computation and memory capacity, and you can select a node type based on your needs. You are charged based on three components: on-demand instance hours per node, volume of data written to your cluster, and snapshot storage that you use.

Pros

    Amazon Aurora

    Amazon Aurora is a fully managed relational database service that combines the performance and availability of high-end commercial databases with the simplicity and cost-effectiveness of open-source databases. Compatible with MySQL and PostgreSQL, Aurora delivers up to five times the throughput of standard MySQL databases and up to three times that of standard PostgreSQL databases. It is designed for high availability, offering up to 99.99% availability within a single region and up to 99.999% across multiple regions.

    Pros

    • Scalability
    • Ease of Use
    • Availability
    • Performance
    • Reliability
    • High Availability