Amazon Keyspaces vs. ScyllaDB
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Amazon Keyspaces | ScyllaDB |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Review count | 17 | 429 |
| Ease of use | 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Ease of setup | 9.1 | 8.5 |
| Quality of support | 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Meets requirements | 9.7 | 9.0 |
| NPS | 68.75 | 67.058824 |
| Small Business | 52.9% | 41.7% |
| Mid-Market | 23.5% | 29.6% |
| Enterprise | 23.5% | 28.7% |
| Total page views | 22 | 1,114 |
| Total LLM citations | 15 | 3,096 |
Amazon Keyspaces
Amazon Keyspaces (for Apache Cassandra is a fully managed, serverless database service that enables users to run Cassandra workloads on AWS without the operational overhead of managing infrastructure. It offers seamless compatibility with existing Cassandra applications and tools, allowing for easy migration and scaling of workloads. With automatic scaling, high availability, and built-in security features, Amazon Keyspaces provides consistent, single-digit-millisecond response times at virtually any scale, making it ideal for applications requiring low-latency access to large volumes of data.
ScyllaDB
ScyllaDB is a specialty database for workloads that require predictable performance at scale. It’s adopted by organizations that require ultra-low latency, even at millions of features or operations per second, billions of embeddings, or petabytes of storage. ScyllaDB’s shard-per-core architecture taps the full power of modern infrastructure, translating to fewer nodes, less admin, and lower costs. Over 400 companies such as Disney+, Discord, Tripadvisor, Expedia, Zillow, Starbucks, and Comcast use ScyllaDB for their toughest database challenges.
- Performance
- Speed
- Scalability
- Low Latency
- Ease of Use
- Querying