Amazon ElastiCache vs. ScyllaDB
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Amazon ElastiCache | ScyllaDB |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Review count | 88 | 429 |
| Ease of use | 9.1 | 8.8 |
| Ease of setup | 8.9 | 8.5 |
| Quality of support | 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Meets requirements | 9.3 | 9.0 |
| NPS | 70.238095 | 67.058824 |
| Small Business | 34.1% | 41.7% |
| Mid-Market | 33.0% | 29.6% |
| Enterprise | 33.0% | 28.7% |
| Total page views | 234 | 1,114 |
| Total LLM citations | 700 | 3,096 |
Amazon ElastiCache
Amazon ElastiCache is a fully managed service that makes it easy to deploy, operate, and scale an in-memory data store and cache in the cloud. Often working in conjunction with other AWS database and storage services, ElastiCache ensures modern applications meet real-time requirements for high data throughput and sub-milli second response times, while serving millions of simultaneous requests. Amazon ElastiCache supports two open-source in-memory engines: o Redis - a fast, open source, in-memory data store and cache.
- Speed
- Cost Efficiency
- Low Latency
- Customer Support
- Performance Efficiency
- Performance
ScyllaDB
ScyllaDB is a specialty database for workloads that require predictable performance at scale. It’s adopted by organizations that require ultra-low latency, even at millions of features or operations per second, billions of embeddings, or petabytes of storage. ScyllaDB’s shard-per-core architecture taps the full power of modern infrastructure, translating to fewer nodes, less admin, and lower costs. Over 400 companies such as Disney+, Discord, Tripadvisor, Expedia, Zillow, Starbucks, and Comcast use ScyllaDB for their toughest database challenges.
- Performance
- Speed
- Scalability
- Low Latency
- Ease of Use
- Querying